The Alaska Press Reacts to Recent Invalidation of Senate Bill 222


Posted Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

Sometimes, even the best intentions produce overly-broad laws that cannot be enforced or that violate the First Amendment rights of innocent parties. Last year, Alaska passed Senate Bill 222 with the intent to protect minors, but the language of the law put an unreasonable burden on internet users, including comic book creators and retailers selling at both brick and mortar stores and online.

CBLDF joined the Media Coalition and a variety of plaintiffs from Alaska in challenging the law. Alaska’s KTUU highlighted the Media Coalition’s efforts to refine the language of the law and bring the law into alignment with the First Amendment before its passage. You can read a summary of these efforts here.

Despite the Media Coalition’s efforts, the Alaska Senate unanimously passed Senate Bill 222. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Ralph Beistline struck down multiple provisions of the law, citing violation of the First Amendment.

Alaska Public Radio’s Ellen Lockyer spoke with David Cheezum, co-owner of Fireside Books, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, about the burden the law would have placed on retailers had it stood:

Either your website or your store clerk have to know two things: to know the content of the books…of every book you’re selling and…to be able to read the minds of the people you’re selling the books to, to know…what their parents want them to read, what their parents don’t want them to read.

Lockyer also spoke with Anchorage attorney John McKay, who worked on the suit:

…if you keep the internet be a vehicle of communicating information that is only fit for children to receive, then that really restricts — unnecessarily and inappropriately — lots of communications that are entirely legal and appropriate for adults.

I think it’s the right result. A lot of times it can be unpopular defending…language that’s indecent or inappropriate but…the First Amendment protects unpopular speech, it protects speech that’s not right for everyone. But particularly, as is the case here, to try and limit speech to what’s appropriate for children really puts booksellers at risk if they can be held accountable for the contents of every book.

You can listen to Lockyer’s full report here.

CBLDF applauds this latest victory for the First Amendment! Please support the CBLDF’s defense of free speech issues like this by making a donation today!

|

The Comic Book Legal Defense Fund and the Comic Legends Legal Defense Fund are pleased to announce that the Crown has withdrawn all criminal charges in R. v. Matheson, the case previously described as the “Brandon X case,” which involved a comic book reader who faced criminal charges in Canada relating to comic books on his computer. The defendant, Ryan Matheson, a 27-year-old comic book reader, amateur artist, and computer programmer has been cleared of any criminal wrongdoing.

The total legal costs of this case exceeded $75,000. After taking the case last summer, the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund contributed $20,000 to the defense, and the Comic Legends Legal Defense Fund contributed $11,000. The CBLDF also participated in shaping the defense, including recruiting expert testimony for the trial. The organization is currently seeking funds to help pay off the $45,000 debt Matheson incurred as a result of his case, and to create new tools to prevent future cases. To make a contribution to these important efforts, please visit www.cbldf.org. Learn more about the shocking details of this case and how you can support the CBLDF's efforts to fight back!Read the full post