Cape Henlopen Board Eliminates Entire Reading List in Dispute Over Cameron Post

July 28, 2014

miseducationIn a disheartening turn of events, the Cape Henlopen School Board in Delaware last week eliminated an entire summer reading list for incoming high school freshmen amidst confusion over how to handle a challenge to one book.

The board had previously raised the ire of both free speech and LGBT advocates by removing emily m. danforth’s The Miseducation of Cameron Post from the list of reading options without due process. Although the titular main character is a lesbian, board members insisted that the ban was only due to profanity in the book. When it was pointed out that several of the other books on the list also contain profanity, however, the board agreed–and did away with the entire list.

The Cape Henlopen summer reading list was drawn from the Delaware Library Association’s Blue Hen Book Award nominees for teen readers from 2014 and 2015. In addition to Cameron Post, the complete list of books that the school board decided it couldn’t be associated with is:

  • March by John Lewis
  • Boxers by Gene Luen Yang
  • If You Find Me by Emily Murdoch
  • More Than This by Patrick Ness
  • Eleanor and Park by Rainbow Rowell
  • The Fault in Our Stars by John Green
  • Butter by Erin Jade Lange
  • Daughter of Smoke & Bone by Laini Taylor
  • The Scorpio Races by Maggie Stiefvater

At Thursday’s meeting, board president Andy Lewis claimed that Cameron Post was originally taken off the list “because there was no process to evaluate it after someone complained.” But a look at the board’s policy document turns up a procedure for dealing with “challenged or questioned materials” under Policy 110:

(1) Citizens of the school community may register their criticism with the school principal. All criticism shall be in writing. The statement shall include the specific information as required on the Request for Reconsideration of Library and Instructional Materials form. The form is available at the office.

(2) The appropriate director/supervisor will chair and appoint a committee of school personnel to reevaluate the materials being questioned and to make recommendations.

a. The questioned materials shall be read and reevaluated by a committee composed of three certified personnel. The three members shall be selected by the director/supervisor and consist of the librarian and two teachers, one of whom must be a specialist in the subject area. The report of this committee will be completed within 20 school days.

b. It is recommended that the director/supervisor invite qualified citizen(s) of the school district to serve on the committee.

c. The director/supervisor’s decision concerning the committee’s recommendation shall be sent in writing to the complainant. Copies of the decision shall be sent to the Superintendent, librarians, committee members, and school principal.

Rob Spicer, the father of a gay Cape Henlopen graduate, said at the meeting that the decision to eliminate the entire reading list rather than follow the challenge procedure was “a copout.” The board, he said, “abdicated their responsibility, because the heat in the kitchen was too hot for them.” Meanwhile, board member Alison Meyer claimed that elimination of the list “was the only way we could make each side somewhat happy.” Actually, the advocates and groups including CBLDF who protested the censorship of one book are not likely to be appeased by the default censorship of nine more. During and after the board meeting, Cameron Post author danforth (who prefers to write her name without capital letters) shared her own reaction and those of some followers on Twitter:

We need your help to keep fighting for the right to read! Help support CBLDF’s important First Amendment work by visiting the Rewards Zone, making a donation, or becoming a member of CBLDF!

Contributing Editor Maren Williams is a reference librarian who enjoys free speech and rescue dogs.

Tags: , , , ,